I believe that each learning theory has its virtues and limitations. Behaviorist theory is effective for conditioning rote behavior, but ineffective for developing deeper conceptual knowledge. Cognitive theory is useful for understanding how metacognition and information processing help to cement long term memory, but provides an incomplete picture about other important factors for learning. Constructivist theory captures the essential insight that people build knowledge from their experience, but doesn't help when trying to convey abstract principles common in Mathematics and Science. Social Cognitive theory extends Behaviorist theory and underscores the power of demonstration, but doesn't explain what kinds of demonstrations are appropriate at what stages. Developmental and Sociocultural theory highlights the need to assist students within their ZPD, but is hard to relate in full to more abstract disciplines. Each of these theories provides a unique and useful insight into human learning, but my interest in teaching Mathematics and Physics favors some learning theories over others.
The two learning theories most important to my pedagogical ideology are Cognitive and Constructivist theories. Breaking down abstract concepts using visuals and analogies is essential in Mathematics discourse. Moreover, it is important each student construct his or her own conceptual understanding through previous experiences in Mathematics. Without coming to terms with concepts oneself through practice and reflection, it is difficult to have long term success in Math or Science. These theories, in conjunction with each other theory as is appropriate, will help to provide access to English Learners, students with special needs, gifted students, and everyone else.
Learning Theories
I believe that each learning theory has its virtues and limitations. Behaviorist theory is effective for conditioning rote behavior, but ineffective for developing deeper conceptual knowledge. Cognitive theory is useful for understanding how metacognition and information processing help to cement long term memory, but provides an incomplete picture about other important factors for learning. Constructivist theory captures the essential insight that people build knowledge from their experience, but doesn't help when trying to convey abstract principles common in Mathematics and Science. Social Cognitive theory extends Behaviorist theory and underscores the power of demonstration, but doesn't explain what kinds of demonstrations are appropriate at what stages. Developmental and Sociocultural theory highlights the need to assist students within their ZPD, but is hard to relate in full to more abstract disciplines. Each of these theories provides a unique and useful insight into human learning, but my interest in teaching Mathematics and Physics favors some learning theories over others.
The two learning theories most important to my pedagogical ideology are Cognitive and Constructivist theories. Breaking down abstract concepts using visuals and analogies is essential in Mathematics discourse. Moreover, it is important each student construct his or her own conceptual understanding through previous experiences in Mathematics. Without coming to terms with concepts oneself through practice and reflection, it is difficult to have long term success in Math or Science. These theories, in conjunction with each other theory as is appropriate, will help to provide access to English Learners, students with special needs, gifted students, and everyone else.